1971 BMW 2002 vs. 2010 Kia Venga
To start off, 2010 Kia Venga is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 2002. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 2002 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 BMW 2002 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 2002 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2010 Kia Venga. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 2002 should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Venga.
Because 1971 BMW 2002 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 2002. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Venga, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Venga (220 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 BMW 2002. (197 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Venga will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 BMW 2002.
Compare all specifications:
1971 BMW 2002 | 2010 Kia Venga | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | 2002 | Venga |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 17:01 |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |