1971 BMW 3 vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 BMW 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 BMW 3 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 BMW 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 BMW 3 (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 BMW 3 should accelerate faster than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 BMW 3 weights approximately 635 kg more than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 BMW 3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 BMW 3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 ZAZ Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 BMW 3 | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | BMW | ZAZ |
| Model | 3 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2330 mm |
