1971 Buick Skylark vs. 1996 Jaguar XJS

To start off, 1996 Jaguar XJS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 5,724 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Buick Skylark is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XJS (222 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1971 Buick Skylark. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1971 Buick Skylark.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Buick Skylark 1996 Jaguar XJS
Make Buick Jaguar
Model Skylark XJS
Year Released 1971 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5724 cc 3978 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 222 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 5170 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 82 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]