1971 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 8,190 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1448 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado (744 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 687 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1971 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Cadillac Eldorado | 1962 DAF 750 | |
Make | Cadillac | DAF |
Model | Eldorado | 750 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8190 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 744 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 109.2 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 109.3 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 7.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2110 kg | 662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2060 mm |