1971 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1972 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 8,192 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado (223 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1972 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Cadillac Eldorado | 1972 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Eldorado | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8192 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2130 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3220 mm | 2480 mm |
