1971 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Chevrolet Camaro (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 741 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1971 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Chevrolet Camaro | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Camaro | 102 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 5025 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2160 mm |
