1971 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1971 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1971 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Camaro | TL |
Year Released | 1971 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2840 mm |