1971 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 258 kg more than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Chevrolet Camaro (318 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1971 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | HR-V |
Year Released | 1971 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5025 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 318 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.4 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1257 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2460 mm |