1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 123 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Chrysler 160 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 160 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 942 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2210 mm |
