1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Chrysler 160 | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | 160 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |