1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 1979 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1979 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Ford Mustang (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Ford Mustang weights approximately 123 kg more than 1971 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Chrysler 160 1979 Ford Mustang
Make Chrysler Ford
Model 160 Mustang
Year Released 1971 1979
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 2294 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 87 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1065 kg 1188 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2560 mm