1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (160 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 68 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Because 1971 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lotus Elan (143 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm). This means 1991 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Chrysler 160 | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | 160 | Elan |
Year Released | 1971 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 997 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2260 mm |