1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Chrysler 160 (79 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 415 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Chrysler 160 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | 160 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1460 mm |
