1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1797 kg more than 1971 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Chrysler 160 2006 Ford Ranger
Make Chrysler Ford
Model 160 Ranger
Year Released 1971 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 2499 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 79 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 125 Nm 174 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1065 kg 2862 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 2120 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2990 mm