1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1415 kg more than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (440 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Chrysler 160 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | 160 | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1971 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 2480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2750 mm |