1971 Chrysler 160 vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler 160. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 99 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler 160. (125 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Chrysler 160 | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | 160 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 5409 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3510 mm |
