1971 Chrysler Charger vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 1971 Chrysler Charger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 4,341 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Chrysler Charger (200 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Chrysler Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Chrysler Charger weights approximately 934 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Chrysler Charger | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
| Model | Charger | 25 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 4341 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 456 kg |
