1971 Chrysler Charger vs. 1996 Renault Clio

To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 3,523 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1971 Chrysler Charger. (139 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1971 Chrysler Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 290 kg more than 1971 Chrysler Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler Charger.

Compare all specifications:

1971 Chrysler Charger 1996 Renault Clio
Make Chrysler Renault
Model Charger Clio
Year Released 1971 1996
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 3523 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 139 HP 250 HP
Torque 272 Nm 407 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1650 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1640 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2490 mm