1971 Chrysler Charger vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 1999 Holden Maloo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,699 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1971 Chrysler Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Chrysler Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Holden Maloo (542 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Chrysler Charger. (272 Nm). This means 1999 Holden Maloo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Chrysler Charger.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Chrysler Charger | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Charger | Maloo |
Year Released | 1971 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3523 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 272 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |