1971 Citroen Dyane vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Citroen Dyane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Citroen Dyane would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1971 Citroen Dyane. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1971 Citroen Dyane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 861 kg more than 1971 Citroen Dyane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Citroen Dyane | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Dyane | C30 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 101 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |
