1971 Dodge Challenger vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1971 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,685 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 810 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Dodge Challenger | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Challenger | Elan |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3685 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2140 mm |
