1971 Dodge Charger vs. 1973 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1973 Zastava 1300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Dodge Charger would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Dodge Charger | 1973 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Charger | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1973 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2430 mm |
