1971 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Renault Laguna
To start off, 2000 Renault Laguna is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Dodge Charger would be higher.
Because 1971 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Laguna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Renault Laguna has automatic transmission and 1971 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1971 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Renault Laguna will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Dodge Charger | 2000 Renault Laguna | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Charger | Laguna |
Year Released | 1971 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2770 mm |