1971 Dodge Charger vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Dodge Charger would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Dodge Charger | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Charger | TF |
Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 3950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2380 mm |