1971 Fiat 850 vs. 2004 Daewoo Evanda
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat 850 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1971 Fiat 850. (51 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat 850.
Because 1971 Fiat 850 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Fiat 850. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat 850. (69 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat 850.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Fiat 850 | 2004 Daewoo Evanda | |
Make | Fiat | Daewoo |
Model | 850 | Evanda |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2710 mm |