1971 Fiat ESV vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1971 Fiat ESV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Fiat ESV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 314 kg more than 1971 Fiat ESV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Fiat ESV | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Fiat | Holden |
| Model | ESV | EJ |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1134 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |
