1971 Fiat ESV vs. 1964 Rover P5
To start off, 1971 Fiat ESV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Rover P5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Rover P5 (119 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Rover P5 should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 1964 Rover P5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Rover P5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Rover P5 (219 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 1964 Rover P5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Fiat ESV | 1964 Rover P5 | |
| Make | Fiat | Rover |
| Model | ESV | P5 |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 219 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
