1971 Fiat ESV vs. 1966 Mercury Cyclone
To start off, 1971 Fiat ESV is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cyclone. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cyclone would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cyclone is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (335 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cyclone should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 1966 Mercury Cyclone is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cyclone. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (579 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Cyclone will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Fiat ESV | 1966 Mercury Cyclone | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | ESV | Cyclone |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 6393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 579 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
