1971 Fiat ESV vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Fiat ESV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-3 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1971 Fiat ESV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 1978 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Fiat ESV | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | ESV | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 135 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 850 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2320 mm |