1971 Fiat ESV vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 1996 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV. 1971 Fiat ESV has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Fiat ESV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Fiat ESV | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | ESV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
