1971 Fiat ESV vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Fiat ESV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 2004 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Fiat ESV (134 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1971 Fiat ESV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade. 1971 Fiat ESV has automatic transmission and 2004 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2004 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Fiat ESV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Fiat ESV | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | ESV | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 134 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |