1971 Fiat ESV vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Fiat ESV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (191 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV. 1971 Fiat ESV has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Fiat ESV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Fiat ESV | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | ESV | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1459 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
