1971 Fiat ESV vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Fiat ESV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Fiat ESV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV. 1971 Fiat ESV has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Fiat ESV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Fiat ESV | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | ESV | Ranger |
Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2840 mm |