1971 Fiat ESV vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Fiat ESV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (229 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (159 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV. 1971 Fiat ESV has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1971 Fiat ESV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Fiat ESV | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | ESV | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 159 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |