1971 Fiat ESV vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Fiat ESV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Fiat ESV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1971 Fiat ESV. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Fiat ESV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Fiat ESV. (134 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Fiat ESV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Fiat ESV | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
| Model | ESV | ATS |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
