1971 Ford 17 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Ford 17. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Ford 17 would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Kangoo (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1971 Ford 17. (59 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1971 Ford 17.
Because 1971 Ford 17 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Ford 17. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Kangoo (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Ford 17. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Kangoo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Ford 17.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Ford 17 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 17 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1971 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |