1971 Ford Falcon vs. 2002 Mazda 2

To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Ford Falcon (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1971 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Ford Falcon weights approximately 184 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1971 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Ford Falcon (259 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda 2. (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1971 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications: