1971 Ford Falcon vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1971 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1971 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 83 kg more than 1971 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Ford Falcon (259 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm). This means 1971 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Ford Falcon | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | B2300 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 259 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1443 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3200 mm |