1971 Ford Falcon vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Ford Falcon weights approximately 120 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1971 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Ford Falcon | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Falcon | 3 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2650 mm |