1971 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1971 Ford Falcon. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1971 Ford Falcon.
Because 1971 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Ford Falcon (259 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1971 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Ford Falcon | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Falcon | Epica |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 259 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
