1971 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Ford Mustang would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Ford Mustang weights approximately 65 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1971 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Ford Mustang | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Clio |
Year Released | 1971 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2770 mm |