1971 Ford Zephyr vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1971 Ford Zephyr is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1971 Ford Zephyr. (81 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1971 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 80 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Ford Zephyr. (153 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Ford Zephyr | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Zephyr | 2000 |
Year Released | 1971 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.7 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.4 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2930 mm | 2700 mm |