1971 GAZ 24 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,111 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 GAZ 24 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (138 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1971 GAZ 24. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1971 GAZ 24. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 GAZ 24 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 1971 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 GAZ 24. (124 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 GAZ 24.
Compare all specifications:
1971 GAZ 24 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | 24 | 6 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2111 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2730 mm |