1971 Holden Belmont vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1971 Holden Belmont. (238 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1971 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Belmont (427 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1971 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Holden Belmont | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Belmont | UTE |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5042 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
