1971 Holden Monaro vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Renault Clio is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 4,141 cc (8 cylinders), 1971 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Clio (250 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1971 Holden Monaro. (182 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1971 Holden Monaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 270 kg more than 1971 Holden Monaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Holden Monaro. (356 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Holden Monaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Holden Monaro | 1996 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Monaro | Clio |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4141 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 250 HP |
| Torque | 356 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |
