1971 Holden Monaro vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 3,297 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1971 Holden Monaro. (133 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1971 Holden Monaro.
Because 1971 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Holden Monaro (263 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1971 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Holden Monaro | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Monaro | Epica |
| Year Released | 1971 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3297 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
