1971 Honda 1300 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1971 Honda 1300. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1971 Honda 1300.
Because 2010 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Honda 1300. (105 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Honda 1300 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Honda | Jaguar |
Model | 1300 | XF |
Year Released | 1971 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 70 L |