1971 Honda Z vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1971 Honda Z is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Riley Kestrel (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1971 Honda Z. (24 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1971 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 375 kg more than 1971 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Riley Kestrel (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Honda Z. (30 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1965 Riley Kestrel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Honda Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 1971 Honda Z | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Honda | Riley |
| Model | Z | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1971 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 355 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 30 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 510 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2380 mm |
