1971 Honda Z vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Honda Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Honda Z would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1411 kg more than 1971 Honda Z.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1971 Honda Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1971 Honda Z has manual transmission. 1971 Honda Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Honda Z | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Z | XC60 |
Year Released | 1971 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 355 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 510 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2748 mm |