1971 Jeep CJ vs. 1994 Renault Clio
To start off, 1994 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1971 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Jeep CJ weights approximately 177 kg more than 1994 Renault Clio.
Because 1971 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1971 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1971 Jeep CJ | 1994 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ | Clio |
Year Released | 1971 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2550 mm |